Some people might wonder what the difference is between InDesign and Illustrator. The two programs have some similar features, but they are geared towards different aspects of Desktop Publishing.
While there are plenty of articles about Quark VS InDesign, I often see questions about the difference between Illustrator and InDesign.
Many of the tools and graphical elements in the user interface of the two programs are similar. Many functions are similar. Printers who accept InDesign files will accept Adobe Illustrator files too. Soo, why can’t one just buy either program?
Illustrator and InDesign have two different purposes. While it is true that one can design an entire flyer in Illustrator and give to a printer to get it reproduced, there are things that Illustrator cannot do, when we talk about laying out a piece of literature.
The first problem arises when one tries to design a multi-page document. Illustrator can only deal with one page at the time. That means one file for each page. It also means that consistency could go out the window because you don’t have the aid of master pages and other tools that you do find in InDesign. You might think: “Oh well, not a big deal, I will just copy and paste the repetitive elements in each document.” Just the fact that you have to create a new document for each page is tedious. Then you start copying and pasting elements in each document, making sure they are all exactly on the same spot, and if a graphic element is going to run through a spread of two or more pages, then you will really start having a hard time. Imagine doing all this for a publication with 120 pages.
InDesign has also other tools that aid the designer in his workflow. It has preflight tools that help the designer see if all the elements of the document are as they should be for offset printing. You can easily check which images are CMYK and which ones are RGB without having to open all of them in Photoshop or some other graphics editing program to find out. You also have a packaging function, which allows you to collect all the files needed for a publication, flyer and so on, in one place. That is images, fonts and obviously the InDesign file.
InDesign gives you a better control over how to place external images withing an InDesign document and treats clipping paths differently from Illustrator.
The tools in the Tools palette of the two programs are different, as well as other functions. InDesign has tools that allows you to do basic editing, such as the Line tool, Shape tools, Scissors Tools and so on. Those tools allow you to create some basic shapes and so on, so you don’t have to open another program, such as Illustrator of Photoshop, to draw a rectangle or a line. However when we talk about graphics editing Illustrator is way superior to InDesign. This is because Illustrator is designed to handle graphics, particularly vector graphics. Illustrator as an array of tools that allow you to do all sorts of things with graphics. It has filters, even 3D options. Illustrator’s purpose is to create and edit vector graphics and that is its strongest point. It is much superior than InDesign in that regard. Don’t use InDesign for extensive vector graphics editing, because it is like using a toothbrush to sweep your floor.
Yet when we talk about laying out a publication, you are better off using InDesign, as that’s what it’s for and its tools are supposed to make your life easier while you design. You would be importing graphics you have made in Illustrator, or Photoshop or what have you, into InDesign. InDesign is what brings everything else together and what will give you the final result. Yes you can use Illustrator for laying out single page documents, just keep in mind that you won’t have the aid of the tools which you would otherwise find in InDesign.
As I said at the beginning, the difference between InDesign and Illustrator is in their purpose and, conesequently, they were developed with different focus.


I like your article on the diffs between inDesign and Photoshop, but you guys need some help with this site. Hurts to look at and you are throwing up all over the user with all that is going on with each page. Good writing though, although “could” was spelled “culd”. You’re going in the right direction I think, just cut back on all the ads if you can. Really annoying and something about it makes me question the motives of the site. Are you trying to educate the design community or make a buck? Both are fair, but I get the impression the latter is more important.
Also, this form here needs some sort of description. Is this being submitted as a comment or feedback??
Thanks for catching that spelling mistake, I fixed it. As you have probably seen now, what you filled in is a comment form.
I also apreciate your feedback on the site, both pros and cons.
Thanks for your great info. I hear that most graphics / illustrator pros prefer quark when it comes to final layout, whats the bid deal about it? I used both Indesign and some quark, but don’t see the tipping point over Indesign.
And there it is again, Quark VS InDesign. There is a whole, and great, site about it, did you know?
I have also worked with both, and the only thing I can tell you is that it’s a matter of preference, a matter of already existing workflows, as QuarkXPress came before InDesign, etc.
I know a designer who is a total whiz with Quark. You look at the screen, and there is nothing, you look at her hands and then you look back at the screen and—what’s that page doing there? You didn’t even see her move her hands! Would you tell a person like that to switch to InDesign, instead of upgrading to QuarkXPress 7? Try it.
Software doesn’t make the designer, and it doesn’t make the design either. Layout applications, such as QuarkXPress and InDesign, are just tools. You should use what you feel most comfortable with and at the same time with what is compatible with your printer’s specifications and the environment around you and appropriate to do the job. The most important thing is that you get the best result.
If you are a crap designer, there is no application that is going to save you.
Thanks for the info.
I’ve never understood why ADOBE cant just make an all in ONE program, allowing you to edit photos, layout designs and ready them for print. It only seems logical that you would be able to utilize everything at once.
I’ve been back and forth with Illustrator and Corel Draw (I was raised on it) and still find Draw easier to use…though a bit cumbersome in its unser interface. Illustrator is slowly catching up.
I’ve just come across your site. This is a really well written article and there looks like a lot of good stuff on this site. But there’s a little problem with the article content box being pushed way too far down on the page, at least in Firefox…probably just a small css problem somewhere…anyway, good job with the content!
I agree with jeff on the article content being pushed way to far down the page on firefox. Regardlessk, I found your article on illustrator vs indesign useful. I was trying to understand why I should use indesign instead of illustrator…. now I understand : )
I am going to work for a company that often gets InDesign files from clients. They then have to convert those files to Illustrator files for large vector drawings. What are the problems with this and how can they be solved? This company hates InDesign because they wish their clients would submit Illustrator files to make life easier. Of course this would be great but it isn’t going to happen since their clients mostly prefer to use InDesign. How can I help my new company with this problem? Thanks! Karen
I used to use CorelDraw X3 as my primary designing tool until I downloaded the trial version of Adobe Illustrator CS3 which turned my whole way of thinking upside down. I instantly fell in love with both it and and InDesign and that’s what I use for my artwork now…
There’s two thing that I miss about CorelDraw however; one being the in-built efficiency it has for creating shapes- You double click the shape and it creates a node (anchor point), and it’s just as easy to make the side of the shape curved.
In Illustrator, I have to select the Pen, create an anchor point on the shape, then the direct selection tool and adjust it. If I want to make the sides of a shape curved, I have to use the Convert Direction Point Tool…etc. In Illustrator it doesn’t have the same power for interactive transparency as doesCorelDraw X3.
I am using Illustrator CS3- can anyone tell me some shortcuts that I can use to make the shape editing more like Corel?
Thanks in Advance…