<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s Aperture: Adobe Bridge Rival, not Photoshop Killer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designorati.com/articles/t1/graphic-design/442/apples-aperature-adobe-bridge-rival-not-photoshop-killer.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/graphic-design/442/apples-aperature-adobe-bridge-rival-not-photoshop-killer.php</link>
	<description>A 360-Degree View of the Creative World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Schultz</title>
		<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/graphic-design/442/apples-aperature-adobe-bridge-rival-not-photoshop-killer.php/comment-page-1#comment-309</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Schultz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 20:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designorati.com/_preview/2005/apples-aperature-adobe-bridge-rival-not-photoshop-killer/#comment-309</guid>
		<description>Kevin&#039;s take on the situation rings true. Photoshop does a lot more than Aperture, but Aperture may be a substitute for Bridge and certain aspects of Photoshop, such as the web photo gallery and picture packages.

My original article on Aperture&#039;s release is here:

http://designorati.com/photoshop/2005/apples-aperture-released-will-compete-with-photoshop-for-pro-photo-market/

And my new article on Photoshop&#039;s evolution in the face of Aperture and new image tools in the new Quark and CS3, is here:

http://designorati.com/photoshop/2005/integration-perfected-photoshop-unleashed/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin&#8217;s take on the situation rings true. Photoshop does a lot more than Aperture, but Aperture may be a substitute for Bridge and certain aspects of Photoshop, such as the web photo gallery and picture packages.</p>
<p>My original article on Aperture&#8217;s release is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://designorati.com/photoshop/2005/apples-aperture-released-will-compete-with-photoshop-for-pro-photo-market/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://designorati.com/photoshop/2005/apples-aperture-released-will-compete-with-photoshop-for-pro-photo-market/'>http://designorati.c...or-pro-photo-market/</a></p>
<p>And my new article on Photoshop&#8217;s evolution in the face of Aperture and new image tools in the new Quark and CS3, is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://designorati.com/photoshop/2005/integration-perfected-photoshop-unleashed/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://designorati.com/photoshop/2005/integration-perfected-photoshop-unleashed/'>http://designorati.c...photoshop-unleashed/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

