A look at the enhancements, the good and the bad of Quark’s layout application
Some people hate it, some people love it, think what you want of it, QuarkXPress is still one of the top layout applications in the market. One of QuarkXPress’ strong points is the ability to deliver files which rarely create problems when printed, though it has a weak point in the same area–its built-in PDF export tool. I found it to create unexpected results in several occasions, sometimes even when creating PDFs through Distiller.
Read more on QuarkXPress 6.5, the Review…
A look at the enhancements, the good and the bad of Quark’s layout application
Some people hate it, some people love it, think what you want of it, QuarkXPress is still one of the top layout applications in the market. One of QuarkXPress’ strong points is the ability to deliver files which rarely create problems when printed, though it has a weak point in the same area–its built-in PDF export tool. I found it to create unexpected results in several occasions, sometimes even when creating PDFs through Distiller.
The PSD Import Xtension is a nice addition and so is the Quark Vista Xtension, which allows you to apply filters and adjustments to graphics within QuarkXPress itself. These are probably the two biggest improvements of QuarkXPress 6.5 over the previous versions.
Since version 5 QuarkXPress has web layout capabilities that are improved in version 6.5. Personally I don’t find the web capabilities too attractive as I didn’t hear many people using QuarkXPress in this field. The application has its place in print design and is not a competition in web design.
From version 6 onwards, QuarkXPress documents assume a new concept: They are in fact projects that can contain multiple layouts sharing common style sheets, preferences, H&Js and so on. But let’s have a look at some of the highlights of this program.
When opening a document, a designer is used to specifying settings such as page size and orientation, margins, grids and so on that will apply throughout. A new document has to be created to design publications requiring a different page size and orientation, leaving the designer with two files to deal with. QuarkXPress 6 treats this a little differently–when creating a new document you are in actual fact opening a project which can contain multiple layouts. If you are designing an entire identity kit for a client, you can have business card, letterhead, envelope and so on contained in one project. I find this to be a practical approach that can result in time savings.
When using multiple layouts in a project, certain specifications are shared throughout:
Furthermore you can synchronize text amongst layouts.
Quark Vista is an excellent Xtension that adds photo editing capabilities to QuarkXPress 6.5. This Xtension is far from making QuarkXPress a fully-fledged photo editing application, but this is not its purpose. It was created with the viewpoint that the average QuarkXPress user utilizes about 10% of his photo editing program’s functions, so why not incorporate those features directly into the layout application? This presents some advantages:
The Quark Vista Xtension allows for two sets of edits: image adjustments and filters. It can be accessed from the Picture Effects palette or by right clicking (Windows) or pressing Control + click (Mac OS) on a picture.
You can now have your PSDs permed with no worries. Or better still, with the PSD Import Xtension you can import your PSD files into QuarkXPress and you don’t even have to flatten them. There are a number of things that can be done with this Xtension:
The PSD Xtension strong point isn’t what it can do with layers, that’s actually the weak part of the Xtension. When put to practice the PSD Import Xtension will flatten the PSD file whenever a layer has some transparency–that includes a file that contains text, any drawing made with brush tools or shapes. That means that the only value of the Xtension in regards to layers shows when creating different versions of the same image on their own layers in Photoshop, which can then be toggled on and off in QuarkXPress, made more or less transparent or can be blended with the layers underneath. The strength of the PSD Import Xtension is in the ability to toggle on and off channels, work with clipping paths and spot colours. Overall the QuarkXPress treatment of PSD files is superior to InDesign CS, but not to InDesign CS 2.
The PSD Xtension is only available to QuarkXPress 6.5 registered users. People owning QuarkXPress 6.0 can upgrade to version 6.1 and 6.5 for free.
QuarkXPress 6.5 can be made more powerful through Xtensions, which are the equivalent of plug-ins in other programs that can expand the capabilities of QuarkXPress. Yet like the program itself they can be very Xpensive. A catalogue for these Xtensions comes with the QuarkXPress box and they can also be downloaded. Xtensions are often made by third party developers.
QuarkXPress 6.5 has definitely some powerful features and it remains a tool for pros despite its competition. QuarkXPress 6.5 is available both form Mac OS X annd Windows. Mac OS 9 users and earlier have to use QuarkXPress 5 or earlier.
System Requirements
For Windows:
For Mac OS
Pros
Cons
Check price and availability.


Worldlabel is a source for equivalent Avery® labels sizes and free label templates for designing.
You’ve very aptly sorted out the good and bad about XPress, Betta. The application, while a bit dated, is still a powerful, useful application. It is well-known and familiar, and (at least as far as version 4 goes) does pretty much what you tell it, achieving predictable results. And you can still get your files accepted by service bureaux; never underestimate the power of an installed base.
The problem is, of course, perception of Quark as a company. Customer service has greatly improved but there are still gaps; they’ve gone six months now since the demise of Aulakh without a new CEO; XPress 7 is still, for all practical purposes, vaporware without a firm release date (even yet!). Quark fiddles with XPress whilst thier Rome is stolen from them, one stone at a time, by Adobe.
My personal view is not so much that QuarkXPress is letting down creatives, but that Quark is letting down XPress, and letting down creatives thereby.
DESIGNORATI
Those are some valid points, Sam.