<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Do It Yourself&#8221; Logos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designorati.com/articles/t1/graphic-design/976/do-it-yourself-logos.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/graphic-design/976/do-it-yourself-logos.php</link>
	<description>A 360-Degree View of the Creative World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Logo Factor - The Art &#38; Business of Logo Design &#187; Do it yourself logo design</title>
		<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/graphic-design/976/do-it-yourself-logos.php/comment-page-1#comment-63635</link>
		<dc:creator>The Logo Factor - The Art &#38; Business of Logo Design &#187; Do it yourself logo design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 10:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designorati.com/graphic-design/general-3/2006/do-it-yourself-logos/#comment-63635</guid>
		<description>[...] As I poured over possible blog topics this morning, I was going to write a rant about so-called &#8216;do it yourself logo design&#8217; - these flash driven logo generators that seem to be popping up all over the place (and currently occupying spots #8, #9 and #10 if you run a search for &#8216;logo design&#8217; on Google). Checking my bookmarks, there&#8217;s a couple of pretty decent takes on this already written (and as I&#8217;m feeling particularly lazy at 6:22 am this cold wednesday) here&#8217;s what the The Zehnkatzen Times has to say with their lowering the bar even farther article from last year. Designorati has a similar take with their &#8216;Do it Yoursef logo&#8217; op-ed piece. We&#8217;ll take a more in-depth view once the coffee&#8217;s kicked in&#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I poured over possible blog topics this morning, I was going to write a rant about so-called &#8216;do it yourself logo design&#8217; &#8211; these flash driven logo generators that seem to be popping up all over the place (and currently occupying spots #8, #9 and #10 if you run a search for &#8216;logo design&#8217; on Google). Checking my bookmarks, there&#8217;s a couple of pretty decent takes on this already written (and as I&#8217;m feeling particularly lazy at 6:22 am this cold wednesday) here&#8217;s what the The Zehnkatzen Times has to say with their lowering the bar even farther article from last year. Designorati has a similar take with their &#8216;Do it Yoursef logo&#8217; op-ed piece. We&#8217;ll take a more in-depth view once the coffee&#8217;s kicked in&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Matthew</title>
		<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/graphic-design/976/do-it-yourself-logos.php/comment-page-1#comment-10075</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 11:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designorati.com/graphic-design/general-3/2006/do-it-yourself-logos/#comment-10075</guid>
		<description>You know it sounds like those sites where you can design a business card by selecting various on-screen elements such as founts, graphics, colour schemes and so on. 

Whilst I agree in most part with what Elisabetta (aka Trinity) says, what is intersting is that tutors on the print and graphics design degree course I&#039;m currently doing sing the praises of such sites.
They point to such sites as the future (in part) of print and design.

Personally, I&#039;d much prefer to do my own logo with my own software using my own skills. At least i know I&#039;m getting something much more likely to be unique and something I can call my own creation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know it sounds like those sites where you can design a business card by selecting various on-screen elements such as founts, graphics, colour schemes and so on. </p>
<p>Whilst I agree in most part with what Elisabetta (aka Trinity) says, what is intersting is that tutors on the print and graphics design degree course I&#8217;m currently doing sing the praises of such sites.<br />
They point to such sites as the future (in part) of print and design.</p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d much prefer to do my own logo with my own software using my own skills. At least i know I&#8217;m getting something much more likely to be unique and something I can call my own creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel John Klein</title>
		<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/graphic-design/976/do-it-yourself-logos.php/comment-page-1#comment-6023</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel John Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designorati.com/graphic-design/general-3/2006/do-it-yourself-logos/#comment-6023</guid>
		<description>I just tried the design sequence on the website. Even  on dialup I was through in just about a minute.

The logo is returned to you in four forms: 300 dpi color and grayscale TIFF; 72 dpi transparent GIF, 72 dpi grayscale. You can get it in a &lt;strong&gt;choice&lt;/strong&gt; of &lt;strong&gt;either&lt;/strong&gt;2-inch, 3-inch, or 4-inch sizes.

Why not all three sizes if you&#039;re going to charge punters $99 for &#039;em.

Shameful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried the design sequence on the website. Even  on dialup I was through in just about a minute.</p>
<p>The logo is returned to you in four forms: 300 dpi color and grayscale TIFF; 72 dpi transparent GIF, 72 dpi grayscale. You can get it in a <strong>choice</strong> of <strong>either</strong>2-inch, 3-inch, or 4-inch sizes.</p>
<p>Why not all three sizes if you&#8217;re going to charge punters $99 for &#8216;em.</p>
<p>Shameful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel John Klein</title>
		<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/graphic-design/976/do-it-yourself-logos.php/comment-page-1#comment-6021</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel John Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designorati.com/graphic-design/general-3/2006/do-it-yourself-logos/#comment-6021</guid>
		<description>Ye Gods.

I don&#039;t know what&#039;s more appalling; the sterile, soulless impression I get from the samples, the feeling that they all came out of a clip-art book, or the realization that they make you pay $99 to &lt;i&gt;do you&#039;re own damn work!&lt;/i&gt;

Give the devil his due though; that said, I&#039;m a bit depressed that you can talk people out of a considerable amount just to come use your website. 

Devaluing graphic design? Indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ye Gods.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s more appalling; the sterile, soulless impression I get from the samples, the feeling that they all came out of a clip-art book, or the realization that they make you pay $99 to <i>do you&#8217;re own damn work!</i></p>
<p>Give the devil his due though; that said, I&#8217;m a bit depressed that you can talk people out of a considerable amount just to come use your website. </p>
<p>Devaluing graphic design? Indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

