<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yet another web design trend?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://designorati.com/articles/t1/web-design/215/yet-another-web-design-trend.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/web-design/215/yet-another-web-design-trend.php</link>
	<description>A 360-Degree View of the Creative World</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:54:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Powazek</title>
		<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/web-design/215/yet-another-web-design-trend.php/comment-page-1#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Powazek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 17:52:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designorati.com/web-design/general-21/2005/yet-another-web-design-trend/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link guys, but I think youâ€™re taking my point to be a little more extreme than I meant it.

Powazek.com is my personal site and itâ€™s pretty much a blog, so thereâ€™s no need for top-of-page global nav. But donâ€™t confuse the message with the messenger.

The message is: Yes, the top of a page is important, but itâ€™s not the only part of the experience that matters. Your best users will wind up at the bottom of your pages. Give them something worth clicking on!

Not very dramatic when you put it that way, I know. And, no, itâ€™s not the first time itâ€™s been said. But itâ€™s a chronic problem in modern websites, so I appreciate you giving it some attention here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link guys, but I think youâ€™re taking my point to be a little more extreme than I meant it.</p>
<p>Powazek.com is my personal site and itâ€™s pretty much a blog, so thereâ€™s no need for top-of-page global nav. But donâ€™t confuse the message with the messenger.</p>
<p>The message is: Yes, the top of a page is important, but itâ€™s not the only part of the experience that matters. Your best users will wind up at the bottom of your pages. Give them something worth clicking on!</p>
<p>Not very dramatic when you put it that way, I know. And, no, itâ€™s not the first time itâ€™s been said. But itâ€™s a chronic problem in modern websites, so I appreciate you giving it some attention here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://designorati.com/articles/t1/web-design/215/yet-another-web-design-trend.php/comment-page-1#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://designorati.com/web-design/general-21/2005/yet-another-web-design-trend/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>One of the basic tenets of usability is to go with what people know how to do, so they don&#039;t have to relearn what they have learned. That supports the thesis here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the basic tenets of usability is to go with what people know how to do, so they don&#8217;t have to relearn what they have learned. That supports the thesis here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

